I agree with you fonters about people ignoring the facts. Delayed accounts, no specific details of any acquisitions, constant missed deadlines - if any looked at the facts the conclusion would be simple.
fingerinthe air - whats your point? that wrn are not complying with their legal requirements? Why would they want to delay publishing the accounts?
its fmsam who is the dim one, me thinks. 'how do you know the accounts and prospectus weren't iisued to the fca?'' utter dawdle, wrn would not be given a listing. if they would have been offered one they would have grabbed it.
I think most of the people on here, whether ramping or deramping or not doing it for shortterm positions they hold. it is a question of being smarter than other investors. Some people are pro WRN and will not believe or countenance anything said against whether factual or not, others believe it is worthless, and are trying to prove a point - they dont need to have a short position, just to show they are smarter than the others.
Re Torture, actually I can understand the analogy. Unfortunately, many people on here have so little imagination, and ability to conceptusalise they miss the point, much in the same way that they tend to ignore the obvious fate of this company.
Hepran, you are right, it is the same issues, but you don't have an answer to any of them.
so, come on Bloodaxe, as you have an idea of whats going on, tell us all, why would Nuna want to make an offer for WRN, and what will it use to make the offer?
Cadis - dont build your house on sand - is that in the bahamas, or relying on wrn????/
I think johnbri4 has a point about the history of dw. If posters disagree bring the facts out which support it
I dont understand cautiossid's logic, but hope he is happy. If there are some derampers, does that mean there is a big demand for the shares???