Are people evil who gives hugely misleading information from one of their 'contacts'?
Good lord Boxster, are you being serious? Here are a few of the 'facts' (as you claim) made by the cheerleaders "the warrants will not be reduced further", "the Chinese have been building a stake all year"(2013), "approval has already been agreed with ZEMA and will be announced before the end of January", "approval must be given by the end of February" "the copper bottom is set at 2p and can't fall further", "ZEMA employees have access to the 1p share options", "don't forget, we still have warrants at 6p" , "Masoud doesn't need the money from the warrants", "there is no need for dilution", "Feilong will provide all of the funding we need" etc...shall I go on? Tell me what nuggets of insight were correct please...whilst you are it Boxster, did I say that ZEMA approval couldn't be given before the end of March and did I say that the warrants would be reduced to 1.25p?
As a matter of interest, over the past 6 months or so, who do you think has been more accurate in their assessment/predictions for BMR...the so called 'derampers' or the ramping crew?
Bugle, I hope that you are not suggesting that we HAVEN'T turned a corner here!!! dufc's contact has been spot on so far 
...anthracis isn't right about many things, but he was spot on about him!
Doesn't look like I missed much yesterday...have we seen any further claims by the ramping team of the warrants being at 6p? ...bizarre
with nothing significant to report...no bounce, no evidence of emergent enthusiasm from the investor event, and no sense of market awareness from the crew. I'm not about tomorrow unfortunately with commitments elsewhere, so be nice to each other and hopefully I'll catch up on Wednesday.
I thought we would see a big surge of interest following the weekend's event...apparently not.
He'll sign in as Keith in a minute to support his premise! Apparently, the team will talk about anything (MMs, the sp, Greenland, SXX, Glencore etc) other than the real issues of funding, off-takes, barriers to approval, and the requirement for dilution! Ostriches look quite insightful compared to BMRers