Why did Glencore not object to BMR's EIS. if Glencore wanted to control the lead and zinc market they could have objected to BMR. Why didnt they.
Shady when you skyped zema what did you ask James Mwale. Also did James answer your questions. Can you inform the BB of the full content of your discussion. Can you tell me why you decided to contact ZEMA and will you contact James in th enear future. Hope we can have a mature discussion
It was argued at some length with Anthracis and dufc on LSE some weeks ago . DUFC made it perfectly clear to Anthracis that Sable Zinc/Glencore processed DRC Copper ore. Anthracis replyed with 'mainly processing things from northern Zambia and elsewhere, not the DRC, as I said several posts ago, once again, before your most recent hissy fit'. Everyone is entitled to there opinion however in the EIS we are treated to lots of information about Sable Zinc/Glencore. Below i have taken some of these facts and posted below 'The feed that Sable Zinc uses is a copper ore that is imported from Glencoe’s operations in the Democratic Republic of the Congo' and 'However, this mine in its last form was closed by ZCCM in June 1994. Currently, the area is still subject to mining activities, such as that of Sable Zinc Kabwe who produce copper (from imported concentrate)' and 'Discussions are underway with one very important potential local supplier, Sable Zinc, EPL’s immediate neighbour, on the possible use of their tailings which are currently deposited at their tailings storage facility at a rate of about 10 000 tpm. The tailings are being dumped on the EPL’s property (Stand 5187) under the condition of a notarial lease entered into between Enviro Pro Limited and Sable Zinc. The feed that Sable Zinc uses is a copper ore that is imported from Glencoe’s operations in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The resultant tailings from their Solvent Extraction and Electrowining processes are potentially a sulphide copper ore, as virtually all the oxide copper has been leached out. Visual inspection of this material and chemical analysis thereof by Sable Zinc, indicate that this material has a grade of ± 4-5% Cu (Sulphide – most probably bornite) and could therefore be a valuable ore supply, given their tailings output rate'. So from the above i think it is clear that DUFC was correct and that Anthracis was 100% totally and utterly WRONG. Now anthracis is trying to backtrack and suggesting positioning of a comma that i and others have totally got it wrong. As usual he will be back insulting me and others but i think i will leave him to it. lol
OK I'm off for lunch and will gladly discuss zema and bmr with you later. Bye for now.
I am open to debate BMR with you today once we have discussed zema
I have heard you talk about dilution 100 times on this board. It osnt a problem to me but you wont get answers if you dont yourself answer questions
Shady it is plain as day that you harp on about the same things day in day out and when you are questioned about a call you were supposed to have made you dont want to discuss it. If you go one about the same subject matter then i have the right to question you on zema
I will answer every question you ask me once we discuss your conversation with james at zema. Is that not fair
I dont want to insult you or anyone. i want to talk about zema