He is most destructive to this stock, if he doesnt have any stock what is making him to spend so much time and energy on this stock. This puzzle cant be breaken easily unless he reveals his true intentions. No doubt he worked for oil companies and has technical knowledge. How does he commenting, who has provided him technical info? Has he attended data room? Who has all these answers.
Thanks Mamms, his focus mainly on providence without much stake, had a look at chariot not much director buys there too why does he winging over here with all negativity. My view every company has some negatives some can try to encash on those by making big. One thing for sure he is posting repeatedly same negative views.
Yes its suspicious if people doesnt reveal there intentions. In this world no one will spare time for free; definately there should be some gain. TOR said companies waited for go into administration which didnt happen, obviously muck is thrown as much as possible. Its like if you dont give me cake will not let others eat piece of cake.
Agree with you sobeit, TOR mislead us for years, you cant trust this kind of CEO ans salary what he gets for all the performance he has performed beyond words. Need to be aggressive
There should be someone who is is selling these as well; who is reducing the stake
I would say RNS info would be more accurate regarding director holdings, they have the obligation to disclose through RNS
Does anyone has info about Newgrange location, its high risk due to reservoir just 500m below waterlevel. Would like to hear why did majors opt around Newgrange; Jimmy looks like has technical info but he didnt answer
Blackrock reduced stake to around 3% when price was 16p now they raised the stake at to above 4% at 12p. Doesnt it look like they acted based on whats coming?
Jimmy, Newgrange prospect is of significant risk which is accepted by pvr as well; my question to you if there is such a risk why did majors surrounded around Newgrange; does those blocks carry less risk whats your views on this