AIM should also be investigating unethical behaviour. Surely they Have a regulatory body that should be examining the company. 1: Has the BOD behaved in the best interest of the shareholders. 2: Has the BOD been transparent. 3: If there is no insider trading How come all the major IIs Know about equity raise before us small investors. 4: How have the auditors signed Off year after year on the accounts of Providence knowing what We now Know. 5: is It legal to Pay disgracefully high Salaries to TOR, JOS and BOD out of borrowed money with no revenue stream. 6: is It normal that the remuneration committee is effectively the members of the BOD assigning themselves Salaries that Many shareholders are very upset about. 7: is It legal to pass company funds i.e borrowed money to Irish Olympic Team against the wish of Many shareholders. 8: is It legal to issue Many misleading and false statements. : is It ok to issue RNS about commercial agreement on Barryroe and thereafter not explain what has happened and whether agreement is bust. 9: is It ok to announce An agreement with Schlumberger without specifying exactly the terms of the agreement. 10: is It ok to dilute small original PE investors into oblivion when other options exist. Many other questions to answer apart from these
Latest from the Community...
Latest from the Community...
Latest from the Community...