Seeding process will always be the limitation issue going forward...unless you think bigger is better. ..think Capex ....as far as the CFQD statement ...wasn't it Nano that has stated they are they only CFQD makers ??? And now you openly admit there are others ...speaking of leaky statements...only helping you understand there is more than one public company to bet on ...if your all in on Nano I wish you well...
Samsung get their quantum dots from Hansol chemical via patents obtained from Nanosys. They are the only cadmium free producer with a product until LG bring out their Dow produced QD TV's in September. If you can point me to a client of QTM or any product containing their QD's I might take some notice. Till then it's all nonsense. I note with some concern QTM never been asked to speak at any of the major QD conferences. Nano's 50k production has always been small scale till Dow comes on line to supply LG on the contract they signed with them. This thread is a Nanoco thread, you should take your QTM bias and start your own thread. Yes, there are many Ponies, but just a few horses imo...
Latest from the Community...
Latest from the Community...
Latest from the Community...