View
Page
Remember QMatials has form with its shipping statements. I recall this negative article from a few years back when they were saying the same thing... “shipped Tetrapod Quantum Dots in sample quantities to a diversified leading Asian-based electronics manufacturer' [link] I think you need to ask why QM have been unsuccessful with cadmium QDots before you can assume they will be successful with cadmium free Qdots. Anyway, I don't mean to criticise too much just when posters don't do their research and assume just because Qm make a statement it's bound to be true. Which is why I prefer Nano's minimal statements as a longer term investor in value.
Latest from the Community...
Latest from the Community...
Latest from the Community...
