Morning Bugle...I'd almost forgotten about that!
Now surely you're not suggesting that the person responsible for the leaked Chinese photos was directly a pawn or propagandist for Masoud? Because this would suggest he was guilty of quite a serious deception...either maliciously or unwittingly misleading PIs on Masoud's behalf would be seen as something quite despicable (and quite probably illegal), I would think.
I can't remember who it was (do you know?), but is this what you are suggesting?
Could someone explain the debacle that occurred when someone on lse suddenly discovered photos online of some Chinese signing agreements with MA. Wasnt Ma then forced to to issue an RNS of some sorts ? It all seems very strange to me and wondered if someone could explain what happened in more detail
Latest from the Community...
Latest from the Community...
Latest from the Community...