if you know you are transparent and just hope youll be effective on enough people while realising some will see through you then that is one thing... but if you think you fool everyone you only fool yourself
tell me something. do you really believe you aren't transparent in what you are doing? if so you should find something else to do. I wasn't born yesterday.
LOL, that's not the most obvious interpretation, its a quantum leap. and one you would of course make given your agenda
gives you something to latch on to to continue your not very subtle scaremongering with though doesn't it. so at least theres that
I haven't done more than skim read the RNS yet shady, if your observation is correct it tells me that either the negotiations weren't that advanced last time he said they were advanced or he isn't that careful with his words
Anth, did you see that the word ‘advanced’ has now been dropped from the alleged off-take discussions…described as ‘advanced’ on the 3rd Feb, but today just ‘continuing’. What does that tell you?
if you did say that back in November then fair enough, but like I said, you're not the only one that doesn't believe a word MA says
ive looked at it more this week than I ever have before
if it stabilises at this level i'll probably take another long at 1.25-1.3 - said the other day I was waiting for the price to stabilise before adding to my postion. it shouldn't drop much further (as in below the placing price) but if it does then ill still wait for it to stabilise then add
Latest from the Community...
Latest from the Community...
Latest from the Community...