OmniChart

MXCP Bertie5 04 Sep 2015

interesting that despite some very negative posts suggesting SP will keep sliding towards the 2p mark it's now breached 3p. Goes to show that MXC is a sound investment and not just for Dreamers or Complete fools!!!!

BPTY bankmuppet 04 Sep 2015

Will it get approval? Some reports that as the feedback the Board got from shareholders was evenly split on both proposals. Seems to be why the price has dropped along with the market downturn and GVC price down 4%. Is nothing simple with this business? Just get the deal done and let's all move on as I can't take any more of this. Aaagghhhh. Perfect storm at wrong time.

BVC car1petbagger 04 Sep 2015

AGM on Tuesday I had planned to attend the AGM and question Marom but unfortunately I need to see a builder on Tuesday morning so I don't think I'll be able to make it. I've been the last two years and was looking forward to hearing what he has to say this year. He is probably relieved that I won't be there.

TRE alltold9 04 Sep 2015

GREAT RNS! Speaks for itself.

PNL Fokisi 04 Sep 2015

Re: PNL They have not sold gold holdings, only value stated has reducedI hope they make further purchases, if gold price continues to drop

COMS dave297 04 Sep 2015

Bargain or Bust After todays RNS we have to consider whether the corner has been turned leaving us with 2 growing & profitable businesses together a few remaining "legacy " issues to be resolved (eg disposing of surplus leases) & the potential for some unquantified litigation (against us).I recently bought a small number on the basis that I could increase if I considered that there prevailed a decent risk reward scenario.We could easily go bust-but with a low Capitalisation & the suggestion that on an operating level we are trading profitably there is also the potential for our SP to increase substantially-particularly as our new CEO & FD are still coming on board.Interesting !

SCE theprior 04 Sep 2015

Overdue Finals Posted on 29/8 last year.I have been expecting them to appear this week but no!Maybe Monday.??TP

AFPO BuyBAO 04 Sep 2015

i wish cautiousid would just do one

RRR scotchoverice 04 Sep 2015

remember choppedfried on iii..go read up

RRR scotchoverice 04 Sep 2015

has done, can do will do...this is a lifestyle vehicle for bell..no shareholder value will ever be created here

MTR scotchoverice 04 Sep 2015

don't know what to make of the almost daily updates in july...promises of imminent news...now silence...still nudging up holding..now over 2.25%

HCP ventura1 04 Sep 2015

The Hotel Corporation plc ("HCP" or the "Company") Proposed new Investing Policy Notice of Extraordinary General Meeting Dear Shareholder, Ref- Mr Yeoman and Mr Jackson's Requisition I am writing on behalf of myself and Mr Jackson, who together have requisitioned a General Meeting of your Company. It is our belief that a change in the board of your company is now necessary and will give all shareholders the opportunity to create value. During the last year I have put forward several suggestions via the board and approached Shore Capital (under instruction from the board) for their support. However, the board have seemingly been unable to move forward, or indeed consult its wider shareholder base on our ideas, without the specific support of its stakeholder, Shore Capital. This support was evidently not forthcoming. As you are now aware, shareholders have now been offered an alternative opportunity; to invest in a new fund structure, advised by Puma Investments, a member of the Shore Capital Group. Aside from noting that the Board seems only prepared to recommend to shareholders a new direction for the Company, if it involves Shore Capital, shareholders should also recognise that the previous Puma vehicle in which HCP shareholders held their investment, resulted in a large loss of capital for shareholders, but a large return for its promoters, Puma. [link] Subject to the passing of Resolution 1, the Company will enter into a property investment advisory agreement with Puma Investment Management Limited. Puma Investments is a subsidiary of the Shore Capital group of companies. -Is this a conflict of interest? -Are the proposed Puma fees fair and reasonable? -Should Shore Capital be voting on this at all? It is my belief that the recently suggested investing policy, resolution 1. put forward by your board, is as a result of the pressure felt by the board after the requisition of the GM and is not a well planned strategy for your company. Shareholders must now vote on three resolutions:- 1. To adopt the new investment plan into another Puma structure (owned by Shore Capital) 2. Appoint Marcus Yeoman as a director. 3. Remove Derek Short as a director of your company. We have received a number of supportive e mails which in conjunction with our own holdings represents approximately 25%, this group have indicated that they wish to vote for change. In order to do this they will vote in the following way:- 1. Against the resolution 2. For the resolution 3. For the resolution I would urge all shareholders to vote at this time in a way that they feel will preserve value and give your company the best prospects moving forward. It is important that if shareholders hold shares in a nominee company and have not received their proxy card, they should contact their broker or advisor and instruct them on the way they wish to vote, all votes must be received before 11am on the 14th Sept. 2015. Yours faithfully Marcus Yeoman Shareholder Contact: [email protected]

EMIS II Editor 04 Sep 2015

NEW ARTICLE: Chart breakout at healthy EMIS "LSE:EMIS:EMIS, which had already flagged in-line trading during its first half, has now confirmed it is fit and healthy, with earnings growth showcasing progress across all its businesses and bankrolling a tasty boost to the dividend. And the ..."[link]

BPTY bankmuppet 04 Sep 2015

You Couldn't Make It Up The acceptance coincides with all the market volatility. As a result, GVC shares down and instead of us seeing a nice uplift, we are flat. Only with this share, unreal. Goes ex-div next week as well.

ENEG mawreese 04 Sep 2015

Re: Marginal Field article I totally agree Vid. This is just not how it works in the North Sea. Minty is never going to be able to sell a consortium idea to any of the players - as you say, cat herding comes instantly to mind. Does he really think that a Maersk / Shell / A. N. Other is going to just stump up a fortune to a rag-tag of loosely connected independent companies, with no track record and then just leave them to get on with building them some allegedly 'fit for purpose' solution to whatever ails them? Don't think so. For me, Enegi is now just being bled dry to keep them all in salaries and benefits until the day dawns when there is no money left - and the Phoenix will doubtless rise again wearing some sort of ABTOG hat. We'll certainly never see our money back.