LSELondon South East
IIIInteractive Investor
DTMdiscussthemarket.com
ATC goldpig1
25 Nov 2015
Re: on the ball this lot are at risk of becoming a proper BOD
QPP melrosian
25 Nov 2015
Re: Actually Oggs. The bit that makes me cross is the failure by the UK government to ensure the AIM market can actually deliver real growth. AIm is virtually an equity only place for new finance. Any fool knows that with growth there is an expanding Bal sht and more working capital to finance.Growth paths are often a series of bridges to the land of milk and honey where a ompany is cash generative. . Gearing is needed for the bridges and after the advent of bancasurance banks & post crash squeeze on bank ratios, banks just haven't been able to step up to the plate. It is not the fault of banks. If the UK wants to grow the economy, the growth of smallcos really should be able to plan fro and make that growth come about. . AIM is unfit for purpose because issuers just can make enough to create smallco corporate bond mkt without some tax incentives to kick start the market. Freddy Lawson's bond washing legislation did not help. Even so there has been jawdropping ineptitude about. Mel
HFEL jd1980
25 Nov 2015
Re: Rubbish charts on iii HFEL v SS... Thanks - makes this IT look a decent option
QPP melrosian
25 Nov 2015
Redde plc Redde Plc T/o £248 EBITDA £31M PE 19 MCap £482MTidler.Mel
InvestorSoiree PXOG Prospex Oil (PXOG) Strikes While The Irons Hot [link]
InvestorSoiree PXOG Prospex Oil (PXOG) Strikes While The Irons Hot [link]
Kev is an accomplished bullshitter who has been sussed and needs sacking. until then VOG is for fools.
InvestorSoiree PXOG Prospex Oil (PXOG) Strikes While The Irons Hot [link]
OXS Nick763
25 Nov 2015
Re: Indaknow cult David, interesting posts and well done to limescale for highlighting that your thoughts are conjecture or guesswork but dressed up a bit as having a factual basis to them. Clearly Calunius (who really would have seen the documents) don't take your view. They would have done extensive due diligence and probably used more than one legal opinion. I doubt if they would have touched OXS with a bargepole if the documents you allude to gave the remotest hint of breach of contract.
OXS Pennyfalls
25 Nov 2015
Re: Indaknow cult Good points limescale..David, I actually like your posts, but it would be nice for assessing your overall accuracy if you could spell Bill TREW's name right once ! This tends to mitigate against some of your posts..Anyway, I do think that DavidUzbek possibly has some legitimate pojnts in a way that can be argued that Brigitte Stern sometime's assesses cases (I've just posted a bit on LSE)She seems a bit of a maverick/stickler/pedantic - and alsways for the "wrong" side, which is a bit worrying, but she has argued and written in the apst that supposed illegal expropriation can be strangely made "legal" by paying back basic compensation/sunk costs etc..However, David, because this was creeping expropriation, starting at a point in 2004, and with many distressing audits and spurious tax claims against the company along the way (eg the circa $230Mill "fine" the Uzbeks seemed to pull out of thin air, and then retracted magically when Zeromax bought in.....then this case is a sum of its parts - and you can't simply say Oxus failed to carry out contractual obligations, as each incremental step in misapropriation then made Oxus' job harder in a compounded way.So, ultimately the failure of finding financing can be laid squarely at the feet of the Uzbeks (for making Oxus' position untenable over a period of years)(If you believe in Oxus' case)
Latest from the Community...
Latest from the Community...
Latest from the Community...
