View
you said 'mainly processing things from northern Zambia and elsewhere, not the DRC, as I said several posts ago, once again, before your most recent hissy fit'. Are you now backtracking
you can check this with glencore yourself, and MA told the same to razor, as I said before DUFC I am not interested in your view or your childish undertakings.
what I said is that they mostly process material from Zambia, that is and remains true. as it will after the congo export ban
I am and willing to have a mature discussion with you. Can you answer my question or do you agree you got it WRONG
anyone can look up what I said on LSE. they will see that at no point did I say glencore didn't process DRC material at sable
Anthracis would you agree with my quick report on your discussion this evening. Are you in agreement of the facts or are you denying you ever said it or do you think the facts ijn the EIS are false.
I think the idea is that BMR get to process that material in exchange for it being dumped there. not sure though. in any event it remains 100% clear that glencore are under no obligation to purchase our material because of some imagined impending shortage on DUFC's part because of the congo export ban. they have plenty of their own material in zambia
So EPL are letting Sable use their site as a tip? Where is the revenue from this facility they are giving them? According to Sables own chemical analysis, where is EPLs proof of concept testing.