View
‘Project capital costs’, totally inadequate…where are the details? Where is the risk and mitigation plan for if BMR goes to the wall...measuring the toxic resources after they have been 'sealed' from years of stagnation is one thing, but after they become disturbed and distributed, then it becomes quite another...so if BMR fails, what will be the impact and plan of action? ZEMA will want to see evidence of cash and a commercial robustness that can withstand the vagaries of the markets and customer demand.
Allowed c$250k/yr for enviro monitoring but no figures on the work required to actually achieve the method statement put forwardto ensure no further pollution released during the work. Should be a prelim sum for this on top of the monitoring and that could be a significant figure.
I agree with both of your points...I think it is really quite poor. Far too much emphasis on the 'as is' and totally inadequate on the 'to be'. Gaps all over it...for example,where is the econometric modelling to demonstrate 'live model' as proof of impact and concept?
If I was ZEMA I would be looking for a number of clarrifications, especially concerning how "clean" the tailings residue will be after processing.
Missed that shady, doubt its a PI, they sneeked it out after close.
KBC, what are your initial thoughts about the EIS?
Good morning...I see that someone decided to offload £25k at close of play at 2p...I wouldn't like to think how much of a hit he has taken, but after reading the EIS he has obviously concluded that it is going to take a long time for things to get moving here. Those people who keep quoting the 20 days statement are either kidding themselves or others.
yo DUFC, if I said "mainly I eat meat, not fish" would that mean I never eat fish? obviously not 
I refer you middle school English lessons 