Share Discussion Forum

View
18:04 27/03/2018

NB: If all that sounded a bit bearish nothing could be further from my mind. Assuming they hit 100 stores by end of 2020 at which point 75% of the estate is close to mature i.e. £0.1m EBITDA pa. That's £7.5m of EBITDA x a multiple of 20 as per DPEU would suggest a EV of £150m. Sure there will be some small dilution to investors from the interim placing. But that's still significant upside from today. And more importantly takes no account of the "hope" value of self-financing continued expansion at that point, which Mr Market will also factor in. So I would argue tuck in at these levels. And leave. I can't imagine (barring WWIII with Russia) there will be a much better opportunity than today's level. Just a shame that Rome was not built in a day...

17:54 27/03/2018

But until the placing is out of the way (and crucially we have the associated price signal i.e. what price is needed to attract institutional funding), and further evidence of sales / EBITDA success outside Warsaw I expect the shares to tread water.

17:50 27/03/2018

I think the biggest positive of today's announcement was that their most mature stores are delivering higher sales and EBITDA than their original "mature store" model predicted. If non-Warsaw stores can eventually follow this path then that is massive for future value. But I agree with you coffe911 that the capex lighter franchise led roll-out seems to be taking a back seat pending a more mature estate. This means higher upfront capex. With available cash of £4.5m and likely 2018 burn at a similar level (I'm assuming the new commissary spiked spend last year) then another placing is clearly coming in the next [6] months. Hopefully that should take them to c. 85 stores by end of 2019 and operating cash flow break even as the estate matures

17:41 27/03/2018

I give up... Let's see what happens over the next few days

17:40 27/03/2018

Part 2: Not sure why this system sometimes cuts off messages midway through. Anyway as I was saying /

17:36 27/03/2018

Perhaps someone is cooking a bid. To your earlier point, the company is a bargain if (and I appreciate a big if) you believe the worst is behind them. Net debt at the interims was £29.3m. Let's assume it will peak at £40m before the rot stops and cash flow inflects. Market cap, even after today's stellar rise, is just short of £20m. Say you lob in a bid of 25p, a generous premium to today's close and even more so when compared to the bottom, and more importantly something that will be just enough to save face for LT holders / allow board backing (given the outstanding risks). It goes without saying that this a slam dunk for the bottom feeders who have churned in since the final big drop. So let's assume £32m for the equity. That makes for a de facto Enterprise Value for our buyer of c. £72m or 0.5x 2017 sales /

17:18 27/03/2018

Predictable result. Nervegas attack must've been to drive up gas prices. [link]

Will Bolton's warmongering rhetoric on Iran drive up oil and gas price, supporting igas ? [link]

14:11 27/03/2018

OTT...watch out for the men in white overalls coming to take you away.

08:45 27/03/2018

Like many posters I was really disappointed to read yesterday's update but like some of the most recent posts I can't understand it. Surely the refinery particularly if its CEPSA wouldn't want to 'throw the baby out with the bath water'. IF the project makes commercial sense why put a 1st April deadline on the signing. Maybe someone will enlighten me but something doesn't add up here?

Page