bigmkll
16 Jul 2016
Worthington reduces rangers claim to £3 million!!! 18hrs ago in Scottish herald confirmed.Anybody seen this??Could we be on the move?
Cattyg1
08 Jul 2016
well well well..everything progressing well with nuna and the company wrn understands progress being made what a debacle total eegits
Cattyg1
24 Jun 2016
its 250pm and very hot out here in japan and i have just laughed out loud at a british patirot who has told the other half about his shares in a conglomerate back in the uk yes wrn oh the irony and how nasty humans can be to take peoples savings
Cattyg1
17 Jun 2016
stop the clock bloodaxe has retired but just got home from work, no big party no drinkypoos no firworks no booom or siizzle sizzle a damp squib just like this share
Andy01
12 Jun 2016
We now flocked
SalopTractor
07 Jun 2016
catty - u r not making any sense again, pls explain?
Cattyg1
06 Jun 2016
earleys..in mytchet 23 rraoa lane laughing his ballcocks off...oh dear greyhund closed!?? call frauster d chapman
Cattyg1
06 Jun 2016
oi oi oi oi. r t o. lololol. america is the saviour .dinny saye aye havant told ye
Andy01
02 Jun 2016
You all have lost
Andy01
02 Jun 2016
Why non of share holders are saying any thig
Andy01
02 Jun 2016
This is the biggest fraud of century
Andy01
02 Jun 2016
We have lost everything
Cliff Peat
02 Jun 2016
Re: Dead The post-mortem could be the interesting for shareholders, pensioners of WRN scheme, creditors of Nunaminerals A/S and anyone investing in London Stock Exchange regulated companies.Discovering (inter alia):1. The reason the various oversight authorities and Stock Exchange allowed a publicly listed company to not publish statutory accounts2. Ditto re: general meetings of members3. Whether all shares, warrants and convertible loan notes were issued for value and in accordance with all provisions of the company's Articles and company law.4. The reasons (13 to date) the Takeover Panel has allowed the suspension of shares in the light of other companies act breaches.5. Whether any person currently disqualified from acting as a director has acted as a shadow director of WRN6. Whether any RNS notifications were made to deliberately deceive.7. Whether the losses on realisation of any company assets at a small fraction of their "book" value were as a result of wholly "arms length" transactions. 8. Whether the director(s) of the company acting as company secretary of the WRN has been at fault or negligent.9. Whether there had been any unusual WRN share transactions the timing of which might indicate the possibility of "insider trading".If you are a shareholder (etc.) there will be other items to add to this list.The answers to these points might show that the company and its officers have acted prudently and in the interests of all stakeholders throughout.What do you think?
Andy01
30 May 2016
LSE Should not allow to list on stock excahge
Andy01
30 May 2016
get fraud in and police
