fingerinthe air - whats your point? that wrn are not complying with their legal requirements? Why would they want to delay publishing the accounts?
its fmsam who is the dim one, me thinks. 'how do you know the accounts and prospectus weren't iisued to the fca?'' utter dawdle, wrn would not be given a listing. if they would have been offered one they would have grabbed it.
I think most of the people on here, whether ramping or deramping or not doing it for shortterm positions they hold. it is a question of being smarter than other investors. Some people are pro WRN and will not believe or countenance anything said against whether factual or not, others believe it is worthless, and are trying to prove a point - they dont need to have a short position, just to show they are smarter than the others.
it will be in the interest of the Greenland government to keep Nuna alive.
Nuna are re-financing - they essentially own 80% of all mineral sites in Greenland and are connected to the government of Greenland. A refinance deal will give Nuna ownership of our mineral sites in Greenland and the other investments
andy - we wont know anything until the 8th August when we should have confirmation that Nuna have taken over WRN
Re Torture, actually I can understand the analogy. Unfortunately, many people on here have so little imagination, and ability to conceptusalise they miss the point, much in the same way that they tend to ignore the obvious fate of this company.
Hepran, you are right, it is the same issues, but you don't have an answer to any of them.
so, come on Bloodaxe, as you have an idea of whats going on, tell us all, why would Nuna want to make an offer for WRN, and what will it use to make the offer?
Cadis - dont build your house on sand - is that in the bahamas, or relying on wrn????/
Latest from the Community...
Latest from the Community...
Latest from the Community...