Re: Bear squeze No you do not get it.I don't have to look back and check posts as i am stating truth.You try to mislead.I haven't checked but so what if i posted on a Sunday.I took profit on first two buys and then got back in cheaper then what a sold for easy as that.Haven t done as well second time around ... but it shouldn't be that easy...... but i have time,
Re: Bear squeze Get it ... so you were out in June then said ""back in at 67p" (on 22 July); so the way I learnt maths that means you have a loss of a bit over 10% before dealing costs.You'll have seen the trading update and the fact the shares are down 8% today. Must be time for you to "top up again". Just remember not to say you've done so on a Sunday, because most people will know the market is shut.p.s. 3rd most shorted share on AiM: you previously claimed that Odey must know something to buy shares in Tungsten as he is 'smart money'. So what about all those who are shorting it? Are they dumb money? Because looking at the share price graph it would appear they've been a lot smarter than Odey.
Re: Bear squeze Checked dates of my buy trades.15 / 6/ 15..... 22/ 6/ 15..... 22/7/15.... 12/5/15checked the first two against posts and i have posted on the day.You can check the last two.You would already of seen that i would guess.If they wish others can now also see.
Re: Bear squeze Unlike you, I'm willing to admit if I am wrong and I'll even apologise, so if you can post the links to the details of your trades previously posted here (at the time, not after the event) which show you are now in profit at 62p bid, I'd be happy to do so.
Re: Bear squeze You really cant be trusted .I do post my trades and you are very good at pointing out on other boards when others have stated conflicting info.no one is right all the time get over it.
Re: Bear squeze No not aware as you have not posted the supposed buys, price and number at the time. We can all claim great trades after the event. Given share has fallen pretty consistently while you have been posting and you have been topping up a number of times a neutral observer would conclude you're much more likely to have made a loss.
Re: Bear squeze As you are well aware i am up on my buys.Good job i disagreed with you.
Re: Bear squeze I think not: what I posted was a view that this company will fail because its business model is useless and that the shares would collapse. And guess what, the company admitted it is struggling and the share price collapsed.Now where I live, that's considered a good call, which might be contrasted with your own 'contributions' which amount to nothing more than a ceaseless string of witless drivel (bear squeeze, looking good, shorts being closed, looking good, topped up, averaged down blah blah blah) never supported by any analysis or insight, just bullish, bullish, bullish because you bought a share, it's gone belly up and you are so emotionally invested you can't admit you were wrong.And all the time while you have been posting this bilge the share price has continued to tank. You need to get a grip on reality and be willing to admit it when you're wrong.
Re: Bear squeze sorry orchard just posting simple facts which others might find useful.All you ever offer is derogatory remarks , and arrogant grammar corrections.
Re: Bear squeze So what?
Re: Bear squeze End of Jan shorts down to 3.39%
Re: Popping higher Do you think it could be shorts being closed? Or a bear squeeze? Because you've tried those lines a few times over the months Ripley and it's added up to the square root of nothing.The shares are still down more than 70% from this time last year.
Re: Popping higher looking good.
Popping higher Spiked higher - currently up 10p 16% 68.50 / 70 spread.Anyone seen any newsflow?
Re: Bear squeze What a W-NKER