Providence Resources Forum

Live Discuss Polls Ratings
View
18:45 13/04/2016

The best of doomsdayers didn't even predict something this serious!

18:45 13/04/2016

Only thing that will save this company is a positive announcement during the suspension - however long that will be!

18:03 13/04/2016

And I thought the way they handled information about the original case was bad - this is beyond understanding!

16:37 13/04/2016

Spuddy, its with this tor made us to live for years, the main challenge for the board to raise court ruling funds

16:14 13/04/2016

Is it possible that a deal on Barryroe is very close and that for that reason Providence sought a suspension on share trading so that existing shareholders would not sell out on today´s terrible news. If a deal on Barryroe were to be announced in the coming days or weeks existing shareholders might feel very hard done by

15:31 13/04/2016

Court would have sent notice about hearing atleast 2 months back, the acts by board is deliberate

15:25 13/04/2016

Its duty of the company to inform public about crucial info, they had all the time to issue rns which so far didnt turn to be true

15:24 13/04/2016

Well wasnt they aware since new year on this front, the question is simple why didnt they inform us early before

15:20 13/04/2016

All, Keep sending mails else these guys take us for granted. Regarding melody loan when i requested terms n conditons they said it's not available to all shareholders. There is segregation attitude

1: Commercial deal that was announced over Barryroe. Is this still valid i.e. is there a date at which Providence have to say that the deal is not valid anymore
2: Schlumberger: What are the conditions of the agreement with Schlumberger i.e. what are Schlumberger going to get for their assistance to Providence.
3: The Agreement on a loan extension facility mentioned with Melody – What exactly are the terms i.e. what do Providence have to pay for this potential deal announced in December.
4: How is it possible for the Auditors to certify the accounts for 2015/16 knowing that a of a circa $10m payment could fall due for which no provisions have been made in the accounts.
5: Why was an RNS before by the company and why did the AIM not ensure that this financially sensitive information was in the public domain.
6: Where exactly has all the money gone in the last 5 years. It is not at all clear.