Re: Agree Still crashing... Incredible!Is this company going to fold?What happens to my £13?
a sh*te end to a sh*te week at happy old MTV
shocking faith shown in the company by the bod.......tells you all you need to know
how can Pilsworth have a holding equating to £161 Len Fertig holds £116 and Kaza the guy that left held £42 - not enough to buy himself a dongle!!!! disgraceful
if I sell my house and buy all the shares - do I get a place on the board earning masses of money and travelling around the world first class?
250k mcap - wow now that is surprising...........most peoples houses are worth more than this company - - dont the bod take more than the mcap in wages per year?
any fool wanting to buy in here should wait until the bod buy - if they are not buying its for a reason!!!!!!!
Agree Same boat, cost more to get rid of these than do nothing. Just consign them to learning from experience..
Re: RNS the question is who would give money to this company ? I am not sure they can realistically raise any more cash..... A good question is how in hell's name did someone talk me into buying these all those years ago....My total value of shares is now less than the cost of paying a broker to sell them ..... makes me xxxxing mad
If this had risen as much as its dropped with my initial "investment" I would now be a millionaire instead my holding has been reduced to a couple of £100
RNS So I said to myself, I bet this is about raising money and oh it is.So someone has left the team and they are not replacing him, why? Because they already have enough people, please read, we have no more money to pay for someone to join the board.We are going to take some pay as shares, why because we believe in the prospects of the company, please read we have no money...My investment is now worth less than £4... glad I sold the vast majority of my shares at a significant loss many years ago, as we have had 2 share consolidations recently and the price still falls, why, please read they have NO Money.
wish you could short this pile of doodoo
Re: NEW ARTICLE: AIM's most notorious money pits I could not get that link to work but found the article eventually.It is dated 15th May 2015 which means it is before the 100:1 consolidation and their explanation of why a large consolidation was not done before has proved to be pretty accurate but it is a reasonable (if depressing) article: [link]
NEW ARTICLE: AIM's most notorious money pits "It is always disappointing when a company that appears to have a potentially good business cannot raise cash to keep going, but it is even more bemusing when companies which have never shown much sign of achieving success can continually tap the ..."[link]
YEARS OF CONTINUOUS SHAREHOLDER VALUE DESTRUCTION