Re: ONEWAYTICKET WARNING!!!!! Don't trust this onewayticket character! Very shady indeed ! He was going around BBs pumping an oil dog called GPX. He enticed a few newbies to buy at 13p now the shares sit at 5 p! He is dangerous and must not be trusted ! Pass on the message! He writes "own due diligence" at the end of each post somehow thinking that it clears him from all ramping blame ! Very shady character! If he was any sort of man he would apologise to the GPX newbies who he duped and misled into buying shares in an illiquid oil dog with assets in a war zone!!!! He we sell here and leave you holding the baby ! Good luck guys , I wish you well ! Be wary of onewayticket and his ilk !!!!
Re: Industry Collaborative Modern may have announced involvement in this project but to state I read it that they have only now got drawn into the process and no doubt they will provide necessary expertise in any industry collaborative.Without doubt though this Graphene sieve / filter that is being used and one things for sure - you need Graphene. That's where I think 4traders have got their scoop story.The lack of "we know of no reason for our company share price rise" combined with silence speaks volumes to me.Exciting times as I think there will be a water utility company spying the potential here.Own due diligence
This is from 28th March `17 Modern Water PLC seem to be the company involved in the desalination process using grapheme.Press release here....which seems to have sneaked under the radar a bit, although MWG`s share price did start a strong rise on Friday followed by another 22% up today![link]
This is from 2012 !!! [link]
Looking for evidence.... wrong market ....no confirmed evidence of Graphene Desal link here just yet the ?....... only speculative assumptions ? .....SAGE
Re: Industry Collaborative Still no alternative company name mentioned on the internet to rival 4traders and the many mentions of Graphene Nanochem in its article.Still no company RNS either dispelling the reasons for the rise. That's probably because they are fully aware of the reason.Enjoy the weekendOwn due diligence
The Next Apple?? Strong possibility? GLA TN
Re: Start of the bounce ? I should add that the RNS this week states that only 10 notes remain to be converted, with no mention of a second tranche. Maybe GRPH has found some cash down the back of the company sofa.
Re: Start of the bounce ? Hi rwrI was referring to the 30 loan notes due to be issued 17 Mar as per RNS of 23/12/16 plus 10 unconverted from the first tranche, but there may have been another 10 notes issued straight after the first 30, as mentioned in the same RNS. So 50 notes worth £1.25m may be awaiting conversion.Since Darwin like to forward sell, there's no knowing how many new shares they've been able to release into the market in the last few days. I'd expect a big conversion around 4p again in the next three weeks since I believe they can choose the lowest 5 of the last 20 closing prices and convert at 90% of the average. Nice work if you can get it.
ISA in Got in at 6.246p despite wide spread showing on iii. Tucked away with a x5 alert. GLA
Re: Industry Collaborative Good Morning Disorder,I had a good trawl of the tinternet last night and couldn't find any mention of an alternative company associated with this story so I am sticking with the 4traders article and Graphene Nanochem as the industry collaborative involved. Confidentiality agreements and secrecy normally surround such research but on this one the cat seems to me to have slipped out the bag somewhere. I am not here to argue as you either believe or you don't and I know which side of the fence I'm taking. The GRPH share price is in Darwin oversold territory in any case and it should move back to the mid to teens when they have cleared. I wish you well for the day ahead and may look to shift some funds and bag me a few more this a.m. Own due diligence
Re: Further Points Oh for hindsight.I guess thats why I am not a "Trader"...I called bottom correctly by buying in, but top slicing what I called a "freebie" ride worked out so differently.I guess the overriding factor is be happy I am showing profit and not as many here a loss.I sincerely hope it rises and returns losses and some for all holders.Averaging down is not always a good thing, but can often be a saviour.With darwin in the game I believe there was never any possibility of total collapse.I like onewaytickets synopsis, and believe that could have meat on the bone.I also understand and take on board ewan take of use caution.As I effectively am riding free, I now resign this to almost a case of not monitoring it other than when I check Investegate every morning between 7 and 7.05As an aside a stock I have held for many years (in excess of 10 years) and always showing a loss on, has recently I believe made an acquisition that should propel the sp northwards.(ASH : Ashley House) DYOR etc etc.... Not investment advice.
Further Points Slight retrace today but 2 days previously of high percentage gains, one of which being exceptional.Accompanied by not one RNS "clarifying recent press speculation" or "knowing of no reason for the share price movement"Maybe after all no response is because they do know .If Darwin have taken the opportunity to forward short sell tranche 2 and their nearly all gone then this should fly on confirmation that Graphene Nanochem is the company involved.Back to the realms of a cheap market cap. again.Own due diligence
Industry Collaborative been out for the day and only just got back in.I wouldn't be too quick to discount the 4traders article. They are clearly confident enough in their sources to have named names and they do seem to have the inside track on this story.[link] let me also introduce you to the term "Industry Collaborative" for that is what I think GRPH are.[link] The podcast at the bottom mentions the term for progressing things.I'm sticking with the 4traders article being on the money.Own due diligence.
Re: GRPH not sea water article Co. Well the Sky News article, the source of the article, does not mention Graphene Nanochem! It's been incorrectly attributed to the company