onedb1
24 Mar 2015
"Bang on" ! lol 1435 ahah !
onedb1
24 Mar 2015
Re: 1435 next target here you go , BANG ON 
) said with a big smile on my face . just sorry it took exactly 1 month lol ....ehm ehm . Pretty much 'bang' on with the timing I had expected too. Not a bad trade at all . Original post on the 24th of Feb . ) Obviously I won't be right the whole time nobody is . But i am decent enough and the posts on iii hopefully will back that up . I don't have an issue though with LG on the contrary , she makes a lot of calls so some will go wrong , I suspect she'll have tight stop losses or timeframes that may be different to others. The shame is that she doesn't explain her targets , timings etc. Other that here ( as I was behaving exactly the same way on purpose ) I always do . Mine are usually 5days . 1 months or max around 3months trades this is due to the time of break out I look at , i.e. if a pattern takes 5 days , 1 month or 3 months to form I have enough data and back testing to support an idea of how long it should then take to reach the target , and an idea of the chance of success and failure , based on pattern testing. Most of the time its all about how you manage the risk i.e. place the stop loss * the chance of failure vs the target profit * the chance of success . Funnily enough that very basic calculation is not understood by 90% of the retail investors out there . What other stocks do you look at Captain LK ? Other than I know you looked at Sirius but that is not one for me. Am starting to look into WEIR ( which is where i saw you posted recently ) , currently formed an interesting pattern and has an interested chart consolidation after the long fall .
LK Hyman
05 Mar 2015
Re: 1435 next target Onedb1,"35p away ! getting closer now ."Don't forget to give us a "Bang on!" when we hit your 1435p target .... cos we clearly ain't gonnae get one from Lambrusco for her 625p target.[link] on the flybridge
onedb1
05 Mar 2015
Re: 1435 next target 35p away ! getting closer now . My TA is always on target )))))) or close lol .
LK Hyman
25 Feb 2015
Re: chartists!! One a,I shall always have a soft spot for LG as a result of her giving me a heads up about the "s" in "https" thingy (how to post links, so that you don't haveta cut 'n paste 'em into a new tab).But, in general, I agree with you about the "BANG ON" remarks. It is always really annoying when someone has a trademark sign-off that they use ad nauseam.LKH on the flybridge
once a week
25 Feb 2015
Re: chartists!! My gripe is:1) they are always sell posts2) they don't give a time frame, or when they do its a very long one3) the arrogant 'BANG ON' remarks when a share falls - sometimes months after the call.Less arrogance in the posts would go some way to not annoying holders of the shares on the boards.
onedb1
24 Feb 2015
1435 next target nm
onedb1
24 Feb 2015
Re: chartists!! hold it ! not all chartists . My calls are mostly TA based and I trade full time for quite some time now . Well over 4 years actually . You may have caught my calls around these bbs. No one can deny the very good track record . I'd give you my account screen print , that would make some take notice . You can't deny that my track record is clear , precise and explained well . Other than my long term play on FRR all the rest is a CFD or Spread Bet . Even if I was a 10 year old on a simulator , the calls are still good . Most not all obviously and I post when I lose , there is nothing wrong with that at all . If one chartist gets 1 trade wrong or 2 or 3 you have to evaluate over a decent data set . How about asking about the Stop loss , the risk reward and the overall profitability . Follow all posts and then criticise . The fact that FINRA acknowledges charting and approves the Market Technician Association chartered status means that you can't blame the tool . How the charts are then interpreted is a different story . I was stalking Genus myself as I do all stocks with a period of consolidation . I didn't trade purely because of my margin ( today full ) and the gap up , I had a buy at 1310 but never got filled due to the gap up . Not because my charts did not spot this . I also had a sell order at 1210 . So attacking charts because Lambrini called this wrong is really wrong . All the best
LK Hyman
24 Feb 2015
Hmmmm I see that my entry point was 1320p back in August 2012, so, given that the divis have not been much to write home about, perhaps it was a little optimistic to state that it was a stroke of genius to buy Genus, given that it's only now 1381p.Still, never mind, eh? It's done very well recently. So that's all right.LKH etc
LK Hyman
24 Feb 2015
Re: chartists!! Once a week,"Bang On... NOT"Oh very good, m8! I had failed to spot Lambretta's booboo, but I shall take every opportunity on the other boards which she and I infest to pull her leg about this.I had been beginning to regret my foray into this puppy (just over 3% of wad) but am now convinced that it was instead a stroke of sheer gen[i]us to invest in the pig 'n bull sperm warrior.Go Genus!LKH on the flybridge also doing well with BLT today (among others)
once a week
24 Feb 2015
Re: chartists!! Bang On... NOT. News drives share prices.
oldjoe1
22 Dec 2014
Re: GENUS BROKER COVERAGE 22 Dec 2014 Genus PLC GNS Liberum Capital Buy 0.00 1,285.00 1,400.00 1,400.00 ReiteratesSP TARGET 1400p
oldjoe1
01 Dec 2014
Re: GNS Alternative To Bacteria Chicken 01 Dec 2014 Genus PLC GNS Liberum Capital Buy 1,291.00 1,291.00 1,400.00 1,400.00 ReiteratesSP targert 1400p
oldjoe1
27 Nov 2014
GNS Alternative To Bacteria Chicken <b>70% of Chickens have bacteria</b>..XMAS TRADE!!.... Beef = GNS GENUS Pork = CWK CRANSWICK as alternatives for chrissy dinner and parties etc.GNS as the better chart and Ive found out they do both Beef and Pork. Long on GNS[link]
