old wise owl
16 Apr 2015
Stake building So Rob Terry has increased stake to circa 9% and seeking authority to go above 10%.Will be very interesting tomorrow as the news gets out. Company does not know Terry's intentions but he is not buying that amount of shares and wants more without plans which must make this share explode into life. Good luck all.
alltold9
16 Apr 2015
The Next Chapter! In the success story 'six new clients' going from strength to strength. Multi bagger from hear.
Olly1975
14 Apr 2015
RT Tweets ? Found this on LSE...@QuobParkEstate Welcome from QPE with our first tweet, we shall be commenting on #QPP and other QPE investments including $DAN.L very shortly!
Orchard Gate
13 Apr 2015
Re: Next ...? I should add those are not my words but from a popular share blog. The item is headed "Calling all M0r0ns – want to back Rob Terry of Quindell infamy in his next venture?
Orchard Gate
13 Apr 2015
Next ...? Okay, we know that he committed accounting fraud, securities fraud and insider dealing. We know that the FCA and SFO are investigating him but perhaps the QPPSAG want to back Mr 2+2 can = 5, Mr Robert Simon Terry once again? Well I can reveal how to go about it.The share capital of the company in Question, The Quob Park Esate, is unlisted but let us hope that an IPO is on the way. Because the website for this exciting enteprise contains an investor relations section. So what does Quob do? In its own words: The Quob Park Estate is made up of equity positions in rapidly developing businesses that leverage Digital Disruption to drive both organic and acquisitive growth in order to maximise stakeholder value. And who is the genius behind all of this? Check out the LInkedin profile of Mr Robert Simon Terry – his new job title is “The Founder, Chairman and Chief Executive of Quob Park Estate”Words fail me…
Orchard Gate
10 Apr 2015
Re: NOMAD Well it won't be Daniel Stewart, that's for certain.
Alresford 1
10 Apr 2015
NOMAD QPP needs a Nomad, any suggestions who that might be?
Orchard Gate
09 Apr 2015
Re: you gotta laugh at OBK Your argument is pathetic. "If you'd bought at X and sold at Y you'd have made Z" is a pathetic argument and one which can easily be run in the reverse direction as I have said. If you take that to mean you're pathetic that's up to you.And talking of weak, it is rather weak of you to have shouted about how undervalued DS was, how it was about to double in value etc etc etc and then when things turned out in the opposite direction you disappear, only to reappear when the share spikes for reasons utterly unrelated to your "argument" and somehow claim credit. Very weak.I'm not sure you could think your way out of a paper bag. Or is that too personal for you?
old ben kenobi
09 Apr 2015
Re: you gotta laugh at OBK Using the word pathetic is quite personal Orchard ... You're just like a politician twisting the argument to suit you ... I bought DOR at 0.7 .. having previously sold at 0.21 ... I then bought simply then back in again when the time was right ... everything has a time to buy and a time to sell ... you know that right ??? ....
Orchard Gate
09 Apr 2015
Re: you gotta laugh at OBK If you consider it "getting personal" to point out that your 'logic' of "you could have bought at X and sold at Y" in a desperate attempt to prove a point is rather pathetic so be it. But as all shares go up and down we can all pick a point in time where a buy or sell would have made a completely theoretical profit, so it really is a very weak case you're making.But as you say let's stick to the facts. Which include the fact that you didn't advocate buying DS because you thought it might pop up like this. You actually said (and I quote):"This has been a no-brainer for a while now .. (very cheap) .. The business is obviously working hard in the background .. check out their web site for client news .. They are well respected in the market place ... the AIM and IPO market itself is picking up after the recession .. these shares have been cheap for a while now with seemingly no one paying attention .. expect them to double over the next couple of months"Here are a few more facts. They weren't cheap and they didn't double: they halved in value. DS is not "well respected" at all. The client news was a huge part of the client base firing DS as broker. And as for AiM picking up, you'll have noticed DS lost is AiM Nomad licence.So on just about every score, you were wrong. Not personal, just factually correct.p.s. nice to see you claiming a gain on DOR but couldn't help noticing you'd previous stated it to be a "strong sell" and likened it to excrement.
old ben kenobi
09 Apr 2015
Re: you gotta laugh at OBK Please don't get personal Orchard ... it is not clever ... but simply shows a lack of intellect in framing an argument ... I am just sticking to the facts ... just like I am a holder of DOR at 0.7 ... 60% rise this morning ... Sometimes I am right ... some times I am wrong (as Jim Cramer always says, I am aware of my fallibility) .. All the very best chap and better luck next time huh ??
Andy404
09 Apr 2015
Ironic, fair play to you sir
Orchard Gate
08 Apr 2015
Re: you gotta laugh at OBK And you could have sold at 28p and bought back at 0.2p. We can all play the fantasy trade game but is that really the best you can do? Because it's rather pathetic.
Andy404
08 Apr 2015
pfp
Andy404
08 Apr 2015
where are you seeing these buys? I haven't seen a buy since 12.17
