SaraRacano
22 Mar 2019
You have gone quiet on me, J Westlock Another is the huge symmetry link between sugar/diabetes & Alzheimer’s disease. Don´t confuse the old Alzheimer’s disease with the one first found in 1906 with today´s they are different. Today´s Alzheimer´s may just be a severe form of dementia. Look how all food companies make their foods highly scientifically to vanishing caloric density, basically they are tricking you that´s why you have to eat the whole box of chocolates or Pringles. Asbestos, big boy? One way or another these food companies are going to get you!
SaraRacano
21 Mar 2019
From the Philadelphia tourist department
SaraRacano
20 Mar 2019
Any ideas what´s wrong with this woman´s neck? The joys of HD TV, she is covering something over with serious make-up. D2D3oGZX0AAzIz3.jpg1200x675 84 KB D2D3mzHWsAIV_4d.jpg1200x675 128 KB
SaraRacano
20 Mar 2019
Who stated thorium was safe? I never said this stuff was safe no pesticide has ever been researched for their long term health effects. There are quite a few potential carcinogens in food you need to know what all these e numbers are that’s how they are disguised. You go on about these meats but the same preservatives can be used in many other food. You need to look closely at nitrites which can cause NHL & possibly HL. There may be more than one variable with various cancers. This is why most cancer charities are cons, if you don´t know what causes the cancers how are you likely to ever find a cure? & the best cure of all is probably prevention. If it´s not cancer, it will be heart disease the only thing you can be guaranteed is that you´re going to die you just hope it´s not to painful. They say dying young is bad but getting old & dying isn´t much better! If you´re interested in prostate cancer, what about caffeine as a cause? the growth in caffeine consumption between 1980 to around 2015, has been roughly 20% the same growth rates as prostate cancer.
J_Westlock
20 Mar 2019
Who stated thorium was safe? Thought you might be interested in this Hardcore… BBC News US jury rules weedkiller a cancer 'factor' Jury to consider damages after one of the world's most widely-used weedkillers is blamed for cancer.
frog_in_a_tree
17 Mar 2019
Are you a unicorn farting rainbows, frog in tree? I wonder if there is a vaccine we could give you? Back in your box Sara. Frog
SaraRacano
17 Mar 2019
Are you a unicorn farting rainbows, frog in tree? Taking immunosuppressive drugs, no vaccine will help you. Dying of measels in the UK I don´t think is aviodable & neither would be considered preventable because ALL patients are seriously ill. Mass innoculation in Victorian times probably would have done very little because people had serious underlying conditions!
frog_in_a_tree
17 Mar 2019
Are you a unicorn farting rainbows, frog in tree? More nonsense from you Sara, I don’t know why you assume that I don’t care about petrochemical pollutions. However, the discussion was about measles vaccinations. Sure, comparatively few die of measles and some of those may havevunderlying conditions, but the vaccine prevention is cheap and effective and avoidable deaths can be prevented. You are on the losing side of the scientific debate. Frog
SaraRacano
17 Mar 2019
Are you a unicorn farting rainbows, frog in tree? Planet earth calling: Let´s assume there are 65m living within the UK, 1642 cases of measel that equates to a 0.0025% probabilty of getting the disease & dying from it is a virtual improbable. You nearly have a greater chance of dying through getting hit by an astroid from space!!! I think driving around the kids in a diseal polluting PCP car loan, car is more ignorant than any vaccine argument theory. This isn´t the Victorian times this is 2019!!! Wakey, wakey! I can actually remember the big epidemics of the early 60s. Great! But do you remember anyone (that was remotely healthy that hadn´t had a lung transplant) dying from the disease?
frog_in_a_tree
17 Mar 2019
Are you a unicorn farting rainbows, frog in tree? Sara, You are so determined to prove your anti-vacc thesis that you are immune to the logic of the data. Sure there are occasional spikes in infection because not everyone is innoculated. I can actually remember the big epidemics of the early 60s. It takes time to build up herd immunity and we can see clearly that this begins to take effect in the early 1990’s as a greater percentage of the population is benefiting from mass immunisation. The ignorance that you promote, Sara, kills people and you should be ashamed. Frog in a tree
SaraRacano
17 Mar 2019
Are you a unicorn farting rainbows, frog in tree? Was it down mass innoculation against measles of meaeles? How many adults have a top up for MMR? The figures have been gradually decreasing since about 1950. Between 1978-79, cases of measels fell 62%? From 1979 - 81 cases of measels fell 68%, this was before the measels jab (1985). 1970 - 1980 cases of measels had fallen 45%, why? There is something wrong with your methodology, it´s not scientific (maths is science). The problem is Johnny cannot read, the problem is Johnny cannot think, the trouble is Johnny doesn´t know what thinking is There are big holes in your argument. Why don´t you care about the real problems kids really face? Car pollution!
frog_in_a_tree
16 Mar 2019
Are you a unicorn farting rainbows, frog in tree? …and the table published shows the efects of mass innoculation against measles. Not hard to see Sara. Frog
SaraRacano
16 Mar 2019
Are you a unicorn farting rainbows, frog in tree? Jesus christ, I have just got the measels figures. The max chance of dying from this disease going back to 1940, is 0.06% & if you look at the guidance you have to be incredibly sick to die from disease. Past 1992, it is highly doubtful that over 25´s would have the MMR vaccination. "Prior to 2006, the last death from acute measles was in 1992. In 2006, there was 1 measles death in a 13-year-old male who had an underlying lung condition and was taking immunosuppressive drugs. Another death in 2008 was also due to acute measles in an unvaccinated child with a congenital immunodeficiency, whose condition did not require treatment with immunoglobulin. In 2013, 1 death was reported in a 25-year-old man following acute pneumonia as a complication of measles. In 2016, one death was reported in a 10-month-old infant who suffered complications due to a secondary infection. All other measles deaths since 1992 shown above are in older individuals and were caused by the late effects of measles. These infections were acquired during the 1980s or earlier, when epidemics of measles occurred." [link]
SaraRacano
15 Mar 2019
Who stated thorium was safe? Improving health & longevity has namely been down to better sanitation. First of all go back to Victorian times & perhaps London in particular. The average life-span was around 48-50 years. 1/2 of all children below 9 died. 5% of all births were still. Tuberculosis, Typhoid, Smallpox, Scarlet Fever, Measles, Mumps, Rubella. The Great Stink (1848) showed just how contaminated the Thames really was. Didn´t Brunnel, suffer serious bad health trying to block a hole in his new East London, tunnel back in the mid 1800´s? “That vaccines and of pharma products are the seat of the problem.†Did I really state that? Can these products have the potential to cause ill health?
beansfordinner
15 Mar 2019
Who stated thorium was safe? Lol. Seriously though. See the process at human waste recycling plants for farmers? Not exactly sweet . Yorkshire water I think shopping it everywhere now nationally
