BMR Mining Forum

or losses. Even the assets being is Barabara Alikhani's hands is not necessarily a showstopper - but FSH will need to review documents, so who is in?

whilst i will support the name change, i will be voting against the share consolidation because i think it is the worst possible moment to contemplate such a move. I have now spoken with Herbert Smith Freehills and they are sending through forms for engagement

Just had chat with AB whilst driving...the compromise agreeent menas he can't release the juicy details without a court order insisting he does..so that needs to be part of any consideration. Also, as part of their investigations they explored what assets might be recoverable from MA - as you'd expect, it's all in Barbara's name...this is a big issue as there may be nothing to go after...

Good point bryn........if using the same office/address its a bit of a giveaway......is it not.

harlequin on papaer YES in reality YES until proven otherwise. In fact they may be a liability as will they need cleaning up/capped at some stage?

Unlike Laffer & LJC - if an affordable approach can be found with a reasonable prospect of recovering losses from the concerned parties, i for one will be keen to pursue. I don't care about the alikhani's reputation..nor do they..with houses in St jOHNS wood and clifton beach etc...we have been mugged, I WANT JUSTICE

And have you spoken with lawyers valencia - or do you just moan at PIs?

Vlaencia - why has my presence got anything to do with anything? Is that really all you have to add, really?

Civil action is the path for restitution...I will pick this up with herbert smith

BE VERY CAREFUL...AIM has power to punish the company! WE WILL PAY A NEW PRICE FOR MAs CRIMES