++++++Problemas Judiciales [link]
Problemas Judiciales [link]
Quick Question I am considering investing here. The mcap here is already £50m.+ and not yet producing. NPV is around £237m. from what I read, correct?So mCap around 1/5 of NPV atm. GemD on the other hand, is already producing, super profitable, very cash rich and has a cumulative NPV of over £1.5b. compared to a Mcap of less than £200m. paying div. next month and migh be acquiring a new mine. Can anyone let me know why the differences are so huge?
The National Court will consider the legality of the Salamanca uranium mine The court declared admissible an appeal against the authorization given by the Ministry of IndustryMadrid 28 ABR 2016 - 00:31 CETThe National Court has admitted an administrative appeal against the decision of the Ministry of Industry to authorize the controversial project of a uranium mine in Salamanca. Industry granted a few months prior permission of radioactive to the manufacturing plant and waste two environmental groups resorted installation. The Berkeley mining project in an unpopulated area near Portugal, which intends to open would be the only opencast uranium across Europe sky. The National Court will consider the legality of prior authorization by the Ministry of Industry granted Berkeley last September . The project of the Australian company is extracting uranium ore and treated in a facility that would be built a few meters from the mine, among small municipalities of Retortillo and Villavieja de Yeltes. The latest manufacturing plant in Spain uranium concentrates ceased operations in 2003. The project is controversial not only because of its environmental impact but also participation in him Manuel Lamela , I extol by the former Minister of Agriculture, Miguel Arias Canete. Lamela has advised Berkeley to the European Commission, which in May 2015 gave a favorable opinion to the project. This is a document called "look", which is not binding, and that in the case of the mine Salamanca was signed by Arias Canete.Lamela was entered in the Community Register of lobbyists in December 2014 . The positive opinion of the Commission is May 2015, but the text with substantial information (such as investment) is kept secret because, as explained a spokesman, the company has not given permission for it to be revealed. Berkeley denies this and says it has itself authorized.Send recordsThe National Court has already requested the Ministry of Industry to send administrative files of the project and to notify the company that the suit begins to appear in person as a defendant, according to the decree of admission, signed last April 22, the I had access COUNTRY.Since the draft Berkeley radioactive facility is considered top-notch, the processing follows the same steps as a new nuclear power plant. For now you have the prior authorization of Industry, which is what they have resorted Equo and Ecologists in Action. "We will argue that the environmental impact statement positive that gave the Castilla and Leon is not worth because the evaluation of a project like this the state needs to do , " said the lawyer of both groups, Manuel Serrano."He also will argue that, as the project develops a few meters from Portugal, it was mandatory to consult," he added. "With this admissibility get that Berkeley does not acquire title and wait for a new government to rectify," Serrano said.Several Spanish MEPs asked the European Commission for this project, both for its proximity to protected natural areas such as the role played by the now European Commissioner Arias Cañete. [email protected] [link]
Re: New presentation on website n/c