roco200
11 May 2018
Re: profit per share - is this it? Isn’t the Co. quoting C3 costs not C1 .I would equate C1 to gross profit & C3 (AISC) closer to Net Profit.
desertjoe
11 May 2018
Re: Good for gold, bad for the world. "That report was on Silver Doctors. I wonder if it is genuine and accurate."Most unlikely, I would think, Thomas, from that source otherwise all the pro-Russian/anti US press would have pounced and maximized such propaganda value.Hopefully you may enjoy this article from Al Jazeera which I feel to be well written and well opined....[link] a previous website that you listed linked to Genie Energy Co has a spin off. The directorate names are most revealing and its "strategic advisory board" have appointed some real evil thereon. All in all it's a great reason to believe in the conspiracy theory of a New World Order headed up by the Rothschilds.(Our sp usually falls again on Fridays but Enjoy the Weekend, folks.)
Temujiin
11 May 2018
Re: profit per share - is this it? My take but adding Net Smelter Royalty Total sales for Q1 = 4,866 ozProfit per oz = (average price of gold/silver sold = $1,433 less cost of production = $612) = 821 per OzProfit on production of 4,866 oz = $3,994,986Minus NSR of 2% = $3,815,086We own circa 51% = $1,996,694Exchange rate at $1.36 = £1,468,157.... However this is pre tax profit, I'm not sure what the taxation rate is, and, finance costs, G & A has to come out of this too before they have money to spend on explorationDivide gross profit by number of shares of 1,059,680,000Totals £0.0013854 per share, or ...... 0.14p / Quarterx 4 = 0.56p gross profit/ share / year.
Richardfromrugby
10 May 2018
Re: profit per share - is this it? i am not selling .if iam wronge and i ecept that i probale am then i have only been valueing the one 1/4 gold production. in profit and reducing debt or any other assets .i will post again to morrow with a full v alueation.good night my privecey fillter are on and any thing that followsis being broad cast by a hakerby 85 windswor st rugby with aprovale from the goerment
Thomas Tallis
10 May 2018
Re: profit per share - is this it? Is this the England you mean?[link]
Thomas Tallis
10 May 2018
Re: profit per share - THIS IS IT Thank you Arborman.
oohthatscheep
10 May 2018
Re: profit per share - is this it? Reminds me of my youth in the forties when firewood was delivered in a tunbril, coal came on a horsedrawn flat wagon, milk was delivered in a horsedrawn tanker and measured out depending on what you required, in a nearby village Chasewater in Cornwall drinking water was also delivered in a horsedrawn tanker, chickens, turkeys and rabbits hung outside the butchers shop, water ran in gulleys on the side of the streets, swearing was banned, in the tens my Dad walked seven miles to school and then back every day, in the twenties my mum sat in their Amilcar with a dog on the running board on a lead, tractors had starting handles, cars started on magnetos so a battery wasn't needed the US dollar was 7 to the pound, I cleaned the family's shoes regularly to earn my pocket money, most people could spell and pronounce correctly, read Biggles, Gimlet, Hereward the Wake and Shakespeare, the web didn't question your spelling because Americans had never heard of the word.A hard life? No it was just normal life!Now you can't look at someone without a complaint
roco200
10 May 2018
Re: profit per share - who is going to arbit... Is Richard assuming a valuation based on 10 times earnings.Probably a bit sporty in this market.But got to add in some valùe for Salinbas (could be worth 2p per share) and other satellites around a Red Rabbit. Then add in the value of our investments, the $3.5m debt owing to us from the JV, the stockpile and any cash.
Thomas Tallis
10 May 2018
Re: Good for gold, bad for the world. That report was on Silver Doctors. I wonder if it is genuine and accurate.Just yesterday Putin and Netanyahu were side by side looking like great friends -[link] certainly know hwo to put on a parade.
Thomas Tallis
10 May 2018
Good for gold, bad for the world. Hang on to your hats - Situation Report: Two Israeli Planes Shot Down And Two Russian Soldiers Killed Israelis In SyriaThe mass-media is absolutely failing to cover this story, and when any of them DO, the only thing being reported is that “Iran launches 20 missiles into Israel from Syria.” There is almost TOTAL omission of the fact that Israel started this by firing tank and artillery shells at the Syrian Army and the Iranians inside Syria. When the Iranians fired BACK, Israel is calling THAT “an attack.”Israeli Cabinet in Emergency Meeting DECLARATION OF WAR “LIKELY”[link] for gold, bad for the world.
Thomas Tallis
10 May 2018
Re: profit per share - is this it? I'm not so far behind you in the grand scheme of things.I enjoyed this - I hope you do too[link]
Richardfromrugby
10 May 2018
Re: profit per share - is this it? hi tt i am 73 years no calculator at school when i left in 1960 and the computer down the English electric was the size of 4 terraced houses .2 apprentices spent all day just running round changing valves.you all seem to agree the i am 2 0 out and if that is correct i apologies.when i have done this before i have had some one more competent than me on the computer and i have dictate the maths.thanks
Thomas Tallis
10 May 2018
Re: profit per share - is this it? I wasn't trying to run you down Richard, nor imply that you aren't a capable person. Technology moves on and I get fed up of trying to keep up.In many ways technology has made our lives miserable and it going to get even worse. In today's news - carrying a mobile phone will be compulsory and it will be illegal to turn it off - they want to track us everywhere we go.George Orwell was right, but of course he would be because 1984 wasn't science fiction - he knew what was planned. His book,just like Huxley's Brave New World were meant as warnings. They knew because they had connections to the elite who rule the world. Huxley's brother was a senior official at the UN and Huxley was Orwell's tutor.
Thomas Tallis
10 May 2018
Re: profit per share - THIS IS IT As I thought, when it gets pasted here it loses the column layout but I hope you can see the working.
Thomas Tallis
10 May 2018
Re: profit per share - THIS IS IT I have put both of your sets of numbers into a spreadsheet side by side.Richard Cider B 1434 1433 612 Minus 612 822 Profit per oz 821 4866 Multiply 4866 3999852 3994986 2879893.44 $ to £ @.72 1997493 We own 50%1468745.6544 We own 51% 1478144.82 $ to £ @.74 Not a million miles apart. 0.0013860302 Per share 0.0013948973 Per share
